Agency complaint / Petition Netherlands Concluded Dec 9, 2022

Dutch Institute for Human Rights — Robin Pocornie / VU Amsterdam ruling

First-ever ruling by the Dutch Institute for Human Rights that algorithmic discrimination was sufficiently presumed; VU Amsterdam given ten weeks to refute. Triggered by Robin Pocornie's complaint against Proctorio's failure to detect her face.
Source
Netherlands Institute for Human Rights (College voor de Rechten van de Mens)
Link
https://racismandtechnology.center/2022/12/24/dutch-institute-for-human-rights-use-of-anti-cheating-software-can-be-algorithmic-discrimination-i-e-racist/ ↗

Related

Agency complaint / Petition

Dutch Institute for Human Rights — Final Pocornie ruling (Oct 2023)

Final judgment in the Pocornie case illustrating the burden of legal proof of algorithmic discrimination, with significant ramifications …
Agency complaint / Petition

Massachusetts AG — student-privacy guidance

Guidance for higher-education institutions covering remote proctoring, recommending vendor evaluation and non-proctored alternatives where feasible.
Agency complaint / Petition

New York Office of the Attorney General — Proctorio inquiry

Informal inquiry into Proctorio's data-handling practices following multiple consumer complaints; resulted in voluntary disclosure-language and accommodations updates.
Agency complaint / Petition

U.S. DOE Office of Civil Rights — disability complaints

OCR has received multiple disability-discrimination complaints under Section 504 / Title II tied to remote-proctoring tools refusing pre-approved …
Agency complaint / Petition

EPIC Letter to ProctorU (Dec 9, 2020)

EPIC letter to ProctorU warning of intent to sue absent reform.